Frequently Asked Questions

The CSU IRB reviews all research projects involving human subjects. The definitions of “Research” and “Human Subject” come from the US Department of Human and Health Services (HHS).

HHS Definition of Research – Both must be true:

  • The activity is a systematic investigation: an activity that involves a prospective plan which incorporates data collection, either quantitative and/or qualitative, and data analysis to answer a question

               AND

  • The activity is designed to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge: designed to draw general conclusions (i.e., knowledge gained from a study may be applied to populations outside of the specific study population), inform policy, or generalize findings.

HHS Definition of Human Subject

The research involves living individuals about whom an investigator will obtain either of the following:

Data through intervention or interaction with the individuals. Intervention includes both physical procedures by which data are gathered (for example, venipuncture) and manipulations of the subject or the subject’s environment that are performed for research purposes. Interaction includes communication or interpersonal contact between investigator and subject.

Identifiable private information.

Private information includes information about behavior that occurs in a context in which an individual can reasonably expect that no observation or recording is taking place, and information which has been provided for specific purposes by an individual and which the individual can reasonably expect will not be made public (for example, a medical record). Private information must be individually identifiable (i.e., the identity of the subject is or may readily be ascertained by the investigator or associated with the information) in order for obtaining the information to constitute research involving human subjects.

IRBs are frequently presented with questions regarding when Quality Improvement (QI), Demonstration Projects, and other similar activities also meet the definition of human subject research and require IRB review and approval.  While many QI and demonstration activities do not meet the definition of human subject research under the Common Rule or FDA, it is essential to understand that some projects may.  This is the case when the QI or demonstration activity is designed to accomplish a research purpose as well as the purpose of improving the quality of care or demonstrating the success/value of a program.  The following materials are included to assist the investigator and the IRB in assessing whether or not individual projects require IRB review and approval.

The intent to publish is an insufficient criterion for determining whether a QI or demonstration activity involves research.  Planning to publish does not necessarily mean that the project fits the definition of research; people seek to publish descriptions of non-research activities for a variety of reasons, if they believe others may be interested in learning about those activities.  Conversely, an activity may involve research even if there is no intent to publish the results.

To determine whether or not IRB review and oversight applies, the following questions should be addressed in order:

  1. Does the activity involve research?
  2. Does the research activity involve human subjects?
  3. Does the human subjects research qualify for an exemption? (Note: At most institutions, the authority to determine a project exempt is assigned to individuals within the Human Research Protection Program and/or IRB )

Research Data Definition

Anonymized data may have previously been identifiable, but have since been de-identified, and a code or link no longer exists. An investigator has NO means for linking anonymized data back to a subject.

Anonymous data is data which was never linked to an individual. Coded data are not anonymous.

Data are coded when a link will exist between a unique code and an individual subjects’ identifiers such as name, medical record number, email address or telephone number. Generally, the study is collected with a “STUDY ID”, and a key is maintained where the STUDY ID is associated with the subject’s identifiers. As long as a link exists, data are considered indirectly identifiable and not anonymous, anonymized or de-identified.

A record in which identifying information is removed.

Under the HIPAA Privacy Rule, data are de-identified if:

  1. the data do not include any of the 18 identifiers (of the individual or his/her relatives, household members, or employers) which could be used alone or in combination with other information to identify the subject. Note that even if these identifiers are removed, the Privacy Rule states that information will be considered identifiable if the covered entity knows that the identity of the person may still be determined.
  2. Expert Determination Method

Information about behavior that occurs in a context in which an individual can reasonably expect that no observation or recording is taking place, and information that has been provided for specific purposes by an individual, and that the individual can reasonably expect will not be made public (e.g., a medical record).

Examples of Identifiable Private Information

  • Names
  • Date of Birth
  • Medical Record Numbers
  • Email Addresses
  • Street Addresses
  • Photographs
  • Audio or Video Recordings
  • IP Addresses

A set of data in which most of the protected health information has been removed. The following identifiers of the individual or of the individual’s relatives, employers or household members must be removed:

  1. Names;
  2. Addresses, other than town or city, state, and zip code;
  3. Telephone numbers;
  4. Fax numbers;
  5. Electronic mail addresses;
  6. Social security numbers;
  7. Medical record numbers;
  8. Health plan beneficiary numbers;
  9. Account numbers;
  10. Certificate / license numbers;
  11. Vehicle identifiers and serial numbers (including license plate numbers);
  12. Device identifiers and serial numbers;
  13. Web universal Resource Locators (URLs);
  14. Internet Protocol (IP) address numbers;
  15. Biometric identifiers, including finger and voice prints; and
  16. Full face photographic images and any comparable images.

PHI is individually identifiable health information transmitted by electronic media, maintained in electronic media, or transmitted or maintained in any other form or medium. PHI excludes individually identifiable health information in education records covered by the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act, as amended, 20 U.S.C. 1232g, records described at 20 U.S.C. 1232g(a)(4)(B)(iv), and employment records held by a covered entity in its role as employer.

National Bioethics Commission Statement

“These activities, generally referred to as program evaluation or quality improvement, are not intended to have any application beyond the specific organization in which they are conducted.  As is true in the area of public health, because populations are the subject of study and because the methods used in program evaluation or quality improvement are the same as those used in research, it is often difficult to determine whether an activity is research that falls under the oversight system.

Definitional issues regarding program evaluation or quality improvement are not limited to health care delivery. They also occur in industrial or educational settings and in social science and operations research. However, if the purpose is to assess the success of an established program, and the information gained from the evaluation will be used to improve that program, the activity should not be considered research involving human participants. Evaluation is a program monitoring tool, and the information gained will immediately benefit the program and/or the individuals involved.

However, when quality improvement involving human participants is undertaken to test a new, modified, or previously untested intervention, service, or program to determine whether it is effective and can be used elsewhere, the activity is human participant research and subject to the oversight system.”

If your project has one or more of the characteristics in the human subject research column, the project may require IRB review. If your project falls squarely into one of the other columns, then IRB review is not required.

HUMAN SUBJECT RESEARCHQUALITY IMPROVEMENT OR ASSESSMENTPROGRAM EVALUATIONSTUDENT PROJECTSCHOLARLY AND JOURNALISTIC ACTIVITIES
INTENTCommon Rule: “Research means a systematic investigation, including research development, testing and evaluation, designed to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge.”

Belmont Report: “[T]he term ‘research’ designates an activity designed to test a hypothesis, permit conclusions to be drawn, and thereby to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge (expressed, for example, in theories, principles, and statements of relationships). Research is usually described in a formal protocol that sets forth an objective and a set of procedures designed to reach that objective.”

OHRP: “The question "what is research" arises in relation to an investigator/institutional activity being planned to gather data to evaluate a specific program, such as a QA/QI activity. Although the determination as to whether the activity will contribute to 'generalizable knowledge' is often based on whether the data will be disseminated by means of publication or presentation, this should not be the sole factor used to make the determination. In general, OHRP gives guidance that if the data will be used to draw conclusions related to a larger entity, then the activity is considered 'research'.”
Intent of the project is to improve a practice or process within a particular institution or ensure it conforms to expected norms.Intent of the project is to evaluate a specific program, only to provide information for and about that program.Intent of the project is to provide an educational experience about the research process or methodsThis category of activities concerns certain activities in various fields that focus directly on the specific individuals about whom information are collected (e.g., oral history, journalism, biography, literary criticism, legal research, and historical scholarship).

Literary criticism -because while a piece of literary criticism might focus on information about the author(s), it would typically focus on the specific author(s) in view.

Legal research… because it would often focus on the circumstances of specific plaintiffs or parties involved in a case. It is not the particular field that removes the activity from the definition [of HSR], but rather the particular activity's focus on specific individuals.
MOTIVATION FOR PROJECTProject occurs in large part as a result of individual professional goals and requirements (e.g., seeking tenure; obtaining grants; completing a thesis or dissertation).Project occurs regardless of whether individual(s) conducting it may benefit professionally from conducting the project.Project not initiated by the evaluator and occurs regardless of whether individual(s) conducting it may benefit professionally from conducting the project. Project occurs as part of assigned course/class work or a requirement of an educational program in order to learn a new technique or pass a course/fulfill an assignment.Project occurs to portray the individuals involved.
DESIGNDesigned to develop or contribute to the scientific storehouse of knowledge; may involve randomization of individuals to different treatments, regimens, or processes; novel research ideas or experimental activities that are not yet known to be efficacious. May be designed to prove a relationship or correlation.Not designed to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge; generally, does not involve randomization to different practices or processes.Not designed to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge; does not involve randomization of individuals but may involve comparison of variations in programs.Not designed to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge; design is often an example or template provided by a professor or course book.Designed to collect and use information about specific individuals themselves, and not generalizing to other individuals.
MANDATEActivities not mandated by institution or program.Activity mandated by the institution or clinic as part of its operations.Activity mandated by the program, usually its funder, as part of its operations.Activity mandated by regularly assigned coursework or educational programActivities not necessarily mandated by institution or program
EFFECT ON PROGRAM OR PRACTICE EVALUATEDFindings of the study are not expected to directly or immediately affect institutional or programmatic practice, although they may also be used for this purpose. Activity will be used to develop a problem statement, research questions, and/or theory-based hypotheses.Findings of the study are expected to directly affect institutional practice and identify corrective action(s)needed.Findings of the evaluation are expected to directly affect the conduct of the program and identify improvements.Findings of the project are not expected to directly affect the program; the project will mainly generate raw data, not generalizable knowledgeN/A
SUBJECT POPULATIONHuman subject means a living individual about whom an investigator (whether professional or student) conducting research obtains (1) Data through intervention or interaction with the individual, or (2) Identifiable private information. May involve a subset of individuals; universal participation of an entire population (e.g., clinic, program, or department) is uncommon; statistical justification for sample size is used to ensure endpoints can be met.Information on all or most receiving a particular treatment or undergoing a particular practice or process expected to be included; exclusion of information from some individuals significantly affects conclusionsInformation on participants receiving a particular treatment or undergoing a particular practice or process expected to be used; exclusion of information from some individuals significantly affects conclusionsCan either include all, most, or a subset of individuals; statistical justification may be used in the context to understand the process of subjects selection; however, recruitment often utilizes convenience samplingPreamble to revised Common Rule: “…the focus is on the specific activities that collect and use information about specific individuals themselves, and not generalizing to other individuals, and that such activities occur in various fields of inquiry and methodological traditions…It is not the particular field that removes the activity from the definition, but rather the particular activity’s focus on specific individuals”
BENEFITSParticipants may or may not benefit directly – benefit, if any, to individuals is likely to be incidental or delayed.Participants expected to benefit directly from the activities.No benefit to participant expected; evaluation concentrate on program improvement or whether the program should continueParticipants may or may not benefit directly; benefit is primarily for the student conducting the project for the fulfillment of educational requirementsIndividual benefit may or may not be anticipated.
DISSEMINATION OF RESULTSIntent to publish or present generally presumed at the outset of project as part of professional expectations, obligations; dissemination of information usually occurs in research/scientific publications, grant proposals, or other research/scientific forum; results expected to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge by filling a gap in scientific knowledge or supporting, refining, or refuting results from other research studies. Results of the project will be disseminated outside the institution for the purpose of sharing the outcomes or implications of the project, not just the process.Intent to publish or present generally not presumed at the outset of the project; dissemination of information often does not occur beyond the institution evaluated; dissemination of information may occur in quality improvement publications; when published or presented to a wider audience, the intent is to suggest potentially effective models, strategies, assessment tools or provide benchmarks or base rates rather than to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge.Intent to publish or present generally presumed at the outset of the project; dissemination of information to program stakeholders and participants; may be publicly posted (e.g., website) to ensure transparency of results; when published or presented to a wider audience, the intent is to suggest potentially effective models, strategies, assessment tools or provide benchmarks or base rates rather than to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge.Any presentations, posters, or publishing (including online) is simply to document the educational experience or completion of programmatic requirements.Intent to publish or present generally presumed at the outset of the project; dissemination of information occurs to document a specific historical event or the experiences of individuals without intent to draw conclusions or generalize findings

If you have questions about whether your project needs IRB review, please reach out to us via email: CSU_IRB@colostate.edu